Shroud c14 dating arizona

Amended Slow Jog (talk) , 20 April 2009 (UTC) Harry Gove calculated that 71% of the sample must be non original to bias the data. I also don't think that Jull, a staunch critic of Kouznetzov, implied that this was the case, although I don't have access rights to view the article.Possibly misinterpreted by original author of this section?Wdford (talk) , (UTC) The scientists involved were both careful and neutral.

(By the way, whether the calculation is "simple" or not depends on your math skills.) Slow Jog (talk) , 16 April 2009 (UTC). I think the "2% carbon" claim should be removed altogether as it's completely false.

The criticism of the carbon dating being taken from a patched part of the shroud and Giulio Fanti's 2013 research are both documented in the section titled "The sample was part of a later repair".

I agree that if Fanti's research was regarded as "conclusive" by the scientific community then it should be more prominent - is that the case?

JTansut (talk) , 11 January 2011 (UTC) I have not looked into this issue, so can not comment, but if you want to be sure, leave a message for user: Thucyd who knows a lot about the topic and discuss it. But I can tell you that currently there is a huge discussion between all scientists around a peer-reviewed article published by Timothy Jull in december in Radiocarbon, his own journal (University of Arizona).

History2007 (talk) , 11 January 2011 (UTC) Hello JTansut and History. Jull claimed that he kept in secrecy in 1988 a unknown sample and that he cannot confirm Rogers' findings (Thermochimica Acta, 2005).

Search for shroud c14 dating arizona:

shroud c14 dating arizona-11shroud c14 dating arizona-58shroud c14 dating arizona-46

If you want to trim it go ahead, but please do not push it back the other way too far.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “shroud c14 dating arizona”

  1. There was also the fact that most of the characters my characters ended up dating tended to be involved in a fair amount of drama and because my character was dating them, their problems/drama became my problems/drama. It can start a crapload of drama otherwise that I would prefer not to deal with. If I'm not laughing, then I'm not having fun, plain and simple. I don't care how "close" our characters get in role-play.